















































































































































RaffertyWeiss Media produces custom eLearning videos and training content for federal agencies, healthcare organizations, corporations, and nonprofits in Washington DC. Our work spans onboarding modules, compliance training, clinical skill-building, accessibility awareness, and LMS-ready course production. We have produced eLearning content for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Department of Education, Amtrak, the American College of Cardiology, and JBS International, among others.
Our production formats include graphics-driven presentations, on-camera hosts, animation, subject matter expert interviews, and role-playing scenarios. All content is delivered Section 508 compliant and compatible with major LMS platforms. Whether you need a single module or a full course series, we handle every stage of production in-house - from instructional design support and scripting through filming, editing, and final delivery.

Welcome to the How to Document the Six-Month Terminal Prognosis and Avoid Claim Denials eLearning Module. Medicare claim denials can result in significant costs in both revenue and time for hospice providers. Reasons Medicare claims are denied include services that did not meet medical necessity, frequency limitations, and missing and even basic coding mistakes.
But for hospice, the number one reason is inadequate medical record documentation to support a terminal prognosis of six months or less, denial code 5PM01. In fact, between July and September 2022, this accounted for 59% of all the denials. The good news is that you can easily avoid claim denials like this with proper documentation.
In this module, you will learn how to provide proper documentation for hospice claims to avoid claims denials. You will get tips to avoid common hospice certification of terminal illness prognosis documentation errors. Upon completion of this eLearning module, you will describe the Medicare requirements for a terminal illness prognosis, explain local coverage determination guidance on hospice determining terminal status, recognize the importance of proper medical record documentation supporting hospice terminal prognosis to reduce claims denials.
This module includes quiz questions to reinforce the information being presented. The problem, the top reason Medicare denies hospice claims centers on insufficient documentation, which is projected to result in $2.9 billion in improper payments. Medical reviewers evaluate all hospice claims to ensure documentation supports a terminal illness prognosis, defined as the expectation that the patient will only live for six months or less.
The medical reviewer will never see this patient, so the care team must present a visual picture of the patient, their condition, and symptoms to support the terminal illness prognosis. Some top gaps in documenting this include, claims go through review and are denied because they aren't meeting the local coverage determination, LCD, status clinically, physicians are not charting the patient's decline, nurses aren't supporting the documentation by the physician, a palliative performance scale is used, but documentation doesn't support the scale's rating.
Terminal illness prognosis requirements and certification of terminal illness. To be eligible for hospice, a patient must have a terminal illness prognosis of six months or less, according to the Medicare hospice requirements. This is true at the time of admission and must be maintained for the entire time that the patient is receiving hospice services.
Further, certification of terminal illness must also occur for the patient to receive or continue to receive hospice services. Let's start with a quick review of each of these terms, terminal illness prognosis and certification of terminal illness. Defining terminal illness prognosis.
A terminal illness prognosis is a life expectancy of six months or less if the terminal illness in an individual runs its normal course. Only care provided by or under arrangements made by a Medicare certified hospice is covered under the Medicare Hospice benefit.
The hospice admits a patient only on the recommendation of the medical director in consultation with or with input from the patient's attending physician if they have one. Documentation to support a terminal illness prognosis is often incomplete and contributes to claims denials.
The patient's care team should document specific measures to show the patient's condition is declining. These measures directly correlate to the limited coverage determination guidelines issued by CMS. We will discuss these in detail in the following sections. Certification of terminal illness for hospice benefits should be based on the clinical judgment of the hospice medical director or physician member of the interdisciplinary group, IDG, and the individual's attending physician if he or she has one regarding the normal course of the individual's illness.
In reaching a decision to certify that the patient is terminally ill, the hospice medical director must consider at least the following information: diagnosis of the terminal condition of the patient, other health conditions, whether related or unrelated to the terminal condition, current clinically relevant information supporting all diagnoses.
No one other than a medical doctor or doctor of osteopathy can certify or re-certify a terminal illness. We will discuss certification of terminal illness later in this module as well. True or false, a terminal illness prognosis is a life expectancy of 12 months or less if the terminal illness in an individual runs its normal course.
Local coverage determination. As previously noted, local coverage determinations are policies that describe guidelines for determining a patient's status. In the case of hospice, LCDs describe guidance on determining whether a patient is considered to have a terminal illness prognosis. MACs are Medicare administrative contractors that review and process Medicare claims.
They use LCDs to identify any Medicare beneficiary whose current clinical status and anticipated progression of disease is more likely than not to result in a life expectancy of six months or less. As stated earlier, the top reason for Medicare hospice medical review denial, reason 5PM01 six month terminal prognosis not supported is inadequate information and documentation to support a terminal prognosis of six months or less.
Let's find out how to avoid this by first learning about the LCD guidance on determining terminal prognosis. Please choose the single best answer. What is the top Medicare hospice medical review denial reason? A, incorrect coding for hospice services for patient with terminal prognosis of six months or less.
B, inadequate medical record documentation to support a terminal prognosis of six months or less. C, incorrect designation of the hospice medical director. D, none of the above. The LCD consists of three parts and disease specific guidelines. Part one centers on showing decline in clinical status.
Part two focuses on non-disease specific guidelines relating to a patient's functional limitations. Part two is used in conjunction with the disease specific guidelines. Part two cannot be used alone to predict a terminal illness prognosis. Part three discusses comorbidities that may be helpful in predicting and documenting a six-month prognosis.
The disease-specific guidelines used in conjunction with part two provide guidance on how to document progression of specific diseases such as cancer, dementia, and HIV disease to name a few. Determining terminal status using the LCD. So what are the specific indications that should be documented by a physician or other care team member to clearly support the terminal prognosis and avoid a claim denial under 5PM01?
Let's take a closer look at each part of the LCD guidelines to find out. Part one, decline in clinical status. Patients will be considered to have a life expectancy of six months or less if there is documented evidence of decline in clinical status based on part one of the LCD guidelines, decline in clinical status.
Since determination of decline presumes assessment of the patient's status over time, it is essential that both baseline and follow-up determinations be reported where appropriate. Baseline data may be established on admission to hospice or by using existing information from records. There are six clinical variables listed in LCD part one, which we'll describe momentarily.
Other clinical variables not on this list may support a six month or less life expectancy. These should be documented in the clinical record. The clinical status guidelines are listed in order of their likelihood to predict poor survival, the most predictive first and the least predictive last.
No specific number of variables must be met, but fewer of those listed first, more predictive, and more of those listed last, least predictive, would be expected to predict longevity of six months or less. Progression of a disease. The first clinical variable to consider is the progression of a disease.
You'll want to watch out for and document four items that are indicative of decline. You'll look for worsening clinical status, symptoms, signs, and laboratory tests. We'll get into more detail about what to look for and document next. Decline in KPS or PPS.
The remainder of the guidelines include decline in Karnofsky performance status, KPS, which is a simple subjective method to assess a patient's performance of activities of daily living or a palliative performance score, PPS, from less than 70% due to progression of disease.
Increasing ER visits, increasing emergency room visits, hospitalizations, or physician's visits related to hospice primary diagnosis. FAST, progressive decline in functional assessment staging tests, FAST, for dementia from less than or equal to 7A on the FAST. ADL, progression to dependence on assistance with additional activities of daily living.
Ulcers. And finally progressive stage three, four pressure ulcers in spite of optimal care. Since determination of decline presumes assessment of the patient's status over time, it is essential that both baseline and follow-up determinations be made and reported where appropriate. Baseline data may be established on admission to hospice or by using existing information from records.
Other clinical variables not on this list may support a six-month or less life expectancy, such as a record that shows a trajectory of decline and increasing ER visits or hospitalizations. These should be documented in the clinical record. Which of these items should be documented to show the progression of disease?
Which of the following palliative care screening tools are included in the documentation of the decline in clinical status guidelines? Part two, non-disease-specific baseline guidelines. In part two, non-disease-specific baseline guidelines, both of the following conditions must be met. One, you must record that the patient's physiologic impairment of function status as demonstrated by Karnofsky performance status or palliative performance score is less than 70%.
Two, the patient must depend on assistance for two or more activities of daily living, including feeding, ambulation, continence, transfer, bathing, and dressing. Disease-specific guidelines can be used in conjunction with the non-disease-specific guidelines. We'll talk about those a little later in this module.
When the word "Should" is used in disease-specific guidelines, it means the guidelines will be strongly considered when making coverage determination during medical review. Part three, comorbidities. Next, we'll discuss part three, comorbidities that can be used to document decline. These comorbidities include COPD, congestive heart failure, ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, neurological disease, including CVA, ALS, MS, and Parkinson's, renal failure, liver disease, neoplasia, AIDS, and dementia.
Even though they may not be the primary reason for terminal illness, the presence of these comorbidities, the severity of which is likely to contribute to a life expectancy of six months or less should be documented for medical reviewers. A note on limitations.
Patient records that do not meet the LCD guidelines when undergoing medical review may be denied coverage unless other clinical circumstances reasonably predictive of a life expectancy of six months or less are provided. The condition of some patients receiving hospice care may stabilize or improve during or due to that care, with the expectation that the stabilization or improvement will not be brief and temporary.
In such circumstances, if the patient's condition changes such that he or she no longer has a prognosis of life expectancy of six months or less and that improvement can be expected to continue outside the hospice setting, then that patient should be discharged from hospice.
On the other hand, patients in the terminal stage of their illness who originally qualify for the Medicare hospice benefit, but stabilize or improve while receiving hospice care, yet have a reasonable expectation of continued decline for a life expectancy of less than six months, remain eligible for hospice care.
Disease-specific guidelines. The disease-specific guidelines should be used in combination with the non-disease-specific baseline guidelines described in part two. For instance, let's use dementia due to Alzheimer's disease as an example. Patients will only be considered to be in the terminal stage of dementia with a life expectancy of six months or less if they meet the criteria as seen here, including stage seven or beyond according to the functional assessment staging test, the patient being unable to ambulate, dress, or bathe without assistance, urinary and fecal incontinence, and no consistent meaningful verbal communication.
In addition, patients with dementia due to Alzheimer's disease need to have had the following within the past 12 months: aspiration pneumonia, pyelonephritis or other upper urinary tract infection, septicemia, multiple stage three, four decubitus ulcers, fever, recurrent after antibiotics, and the inability to maintain sufficient fluid and calorie intake with 10% weight loss during the previous six months, or serum albumin less than 2.5.
The full list of disease-specific guidelines is included in the LCD under general information. Documenting six-month terminal prognosis. Now that we've discussed how hospice coverage is determined, let's talk about how to properly document terminal prognosis of six months or less. It may be your initial instinct as a healthcare provider to document what you've been doing to help the patient improve their condition.
However, in situations where a patient is terminally ill and in hospice, even the best care will likely not help the patient improve. To avoid claims denials, it's critical to accurately paint a picture of the patient's health for the medical reviewer.
The medical review team will review every hospice claim and will never see the patient. So it's imperative that the care team provides clear documentation to support the terminal status. It may be helpful to remember this phrase as you're documenting. Why here?
Why now? Meaning, why are you here with this patient? And why now? What is going on that requires a member of the healthcare team at this time? There are specific items that can be documented to guide hospice providers and staff to improve the completeness and accuracy of documentation of Medicare covered hospice services.
Next, we're going to go over these items that, when documented, can help support the six-month terminal prognosis. And remember, including a good narrative in your notes while charting can go a long way in painting the picture for the medical reviewer.
Documentation to support the terminal prognosis at the time of hospice admission may include changes in or deterioration of a condition to initiate the hospice referral, diagnostic documentation to support terminal illness and an anticipated life expectancy of six months or less, and physician assessments and documentation.
You should also document a date of diagnosis, the course of the illness, the patient's desire for palliative curative care, and records that show a trajectory of decline. Documentation to support the terminal prognosis throughout the hospice election include changes in the patient's weight, worsening diagnostic lab results, changes in pain.
Examples of changes you can document include the type of pain, ache, throb, sharp, the location of the pain, upper lower, the frequency of the pain, constantly, hourly, daily, medication usage, including dosage, frequency, and effectiveness. You'll also want to document changes in responsiveness.
You can include things like alert, less responsive, unresponsive, skin integrity. Make note of whether the skin is fragile, intact, tears easily, or if there are broken wounds. You should also document any changes in the patient's dependence on assistance with activities of daily living.
Make note whether the patient can dress, bathe, and ambulate, and whether they can do these things assisted or unassisted. Also, document ambulation distance in feet or steps if applicable. Documentation should include changes in anthropomorphic measurements like abdominal girth measured in inches or centimeters and mid-arm or thigh circumference measurements also measured in inches or centimeters.
Changes in signs and symptoms should also be noted, including respiratory rate increases or decreases, dyspnea, oxygen flow rate documented by liters per minute, hyper or hypotension, radial or apical pulse noted as tachycardia, bradycardic, regular, irregular, edema, no details such as grade level one through four, pitting, non-pitting, and turgor.
Note whether it is slow or normal. You should also document incontinence and the frequency to which that occurs. Changes in strength or weakness should also be noted, along with changes in lucidity. You can note whether the patient is oriented or confused.
Changes in intake or output should be documented with details about the amounts documented in cups, liters, ounces, teaspoons, milligrams, milliliters, CCs, and frequency. Documentation is critical to the support of the terminal prognosis status. It's important to remember that your documentation should paint a picture of the patient's conditions and symptoms to support terminal prognosis.
This includes being objective and including quantifiable values or measures in your notes. For example, include pounds when documenting weight loss, include location on the pain scale, a four out of 10 when documenting increased pain. Include number of inches when documenting the MAC.
Documentation must paint a picture of the patient, their conditions and symptoms which support a life expectancy of six months or less. Avoid the use of vague statements such as "Disease progressing" or "Slow decline," as these statements do not include enough detail for a medical reviewer to certify that a patient's life expectancy is six months or less.
Congruency in documentation. Keep in mind that your documentation must be consistent across care team members and with whatever scoring scale you are using to evaluate your patient. Now, we are going to take a look at examples in which the documentation is incongruent with the patient status.
In this instance, the stated KPS score is 40, meaning the patient requires considerable assistance and medical care, and the palliative performance scale is also 40, meaning the patient is mostly bedridden, unable to perform most activities and requires assistance. However, the nursing documentation states that the patient is able to perform all of their activities of daily living independently.
The second example uses the functional assessment staging test to assess a patient resulting in a score of 7C, which is severe dementia and can no longer walk with a mental age of one year old. Yet the documentation states that the patient met chaplain at the door today and requested they walk outside during their visit, and the chaplain and patient walked around vegetable garden.
The last example classifies a patient using the New York Health Association classification of heart failure as classification four, meaning they are unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort and have symptoms of heart failure at rest. Documentation states that the patient is comfortable at rest, can shower without assistance with brief rest, which is incongruent.
Certification of terminal illness, CTI. Now let's talk a little bit about certification of terminal illness. Please note, Medicare cannot make payments on claims with incorrect or missing dates, signatures, or identifying roles of the physicians, so accurate documentation on CTIs is critical.
Let's talk about some steps to help avoid the most common types of documentation errors. When is a CTI needed? For patients to receive hospice coverage under Medicare, physicians must complete CTI documentation at these intervals. Benefit period one, the first 90 days, benefit period two, the next 90 days, benefit periods three plus each subsequent 60-day period.
What should be included in the CTI? The CTI should include: statement of terminal illness, simple statement that the patient's life expectancy is six months or less if the terminal illness runs its normal course; clinical findings that support terminal illness, specific clinical findings, ergo patient diagnosis and prognosis, laboratory results, rapid decline in patient status to support a life expectancy of six months or less; hospice benefit period or periods specific from and through dates for each period of hospice care; narrative, synthesis of the patient's individual clinical circumstances that support a life expectancy of six months or less, and a statement attesting that the physician wrote the narrative based on their review of the patient's medical record or an examination; physician signature and date, legible physician signature and date directly below the narrative.
If illegible, type or print the name below the signature. Face-to-face encounter and attestation, face-to-face visit by a hospice physician or hospice nurse practitioner. What documentation do you need across benefit periods? It varies. Documentation requirements vary across benefit periods. This chart breaks down those differences.
More information can be found in this MLN matters article. Tips to avoid common hospice certification of terminal illness errors. Next, we'll go through a few tips to help avoid the most common mistakes when it comes to certification of terminal illness.
First, make sure the correct dates and signatures are included. Both the hospice medical director and attending physician, if applicable, need to sign the initial certification. Signatures need to be legible. If not, follow them with the printed or typed names. Ensure the physicians date their signatures.
Do not predate physician certification signatures. Second, be sure to include a physician narrative and attestation statement. Include a brief narrative explaining clinical findings that support a life expectancy of six months or less. The certification should give specific clinical findings, for example, signs, symptoms, laboratory testing, weights, et cetera.
Third, state the dates of certification. Clearly state the dates the certification period encompasses. For example, benefit period date, month/day/year, two, month/day/year. Fourth, complete the face-to-face encounter and attestation. A hospice physician or nurse practitioner must have a face-to-face encounter with each hospice beneficiary prior to the beginning of the beneficiary's third benefit period and prior to each subsequent benefit period.
Is this physician narrative statement complete? Further, notes about changes in pain and dyspnea and the patient's oxygen dependence and morphine cover changes in pain and signs and symptoms from the suggested documentation to support hospice services. Including a time period for the dyspnea and pain and frequency of morphine helps provide a clear picture of the patient's decline.
Thank you for completing the How to Document the Six-Month Terminal Prognosis and Avoid Claim Denials eLearning Module.

Unit two: Activation of Ambassadors. Activation for Planned Events. All ambassadors will receive an email notification requesting assistance for a planned event and listing the available shifts. You should reply to the email noting your preferred shift. When all shifts are filled, you will receive a follow-up email that will inform you that no further response is necessary.
If an event occurs, you should bring the ambassador kit to the specified meeting point and promptly report to the event supervisor at least 15 minutes before your designated shift starts. During this point, you will receive your pre-shift briefing, which will give you all the information needed to respond to a given incident.
Activation for unplanned incidents. Amtrak's new communicator system will be used to communicate unplanned incidents to all ambassadors. Your contact information will be programmed into the communicator system so that when an incident occurs, you will be easy to reach. Before you report to an unplanned incident, you should ensure that there is nothing that would prevent you from performing your responsibilities.
If you are able to report, you should respond to the communicator with an affirmative message. If you are not able to make it to an incident, the communicator will find another suitable employee to fill your position. Remember, if possible, you should bring your ambassador kit to the incident so you can be prepared to tackle any incident that comes your way.
Knowledge check. Question one. If ambassadors are asked to respond to a given incident, how will they be notified? A. Email. B. Telephone. C. By text message. D. By the communicator, based on the preferences set in your ambassador profile.
.jpg)
Claire: Hi, Mrs. Diggs.
Mrs. Diggs: Hi.
Claire: We met when you were here to see the doctor. I'm Claire, the medical assistant. Today we're going to do your annual wellness visit. We've already taken your height, weight, and blood pressure on the way in, and I see you've completed your health risk assessment.Thank you. That will be a big help.
Mrs. Diggs: Oh, good. It's a little strange to be here and not see the doctor though.
Claire: Oh, I can understand that. I perform these visits as part of your clinical care team, but the doctor is here and available when we need her.In this visit, I'm going to ask you a few questions about your health and medical and family history. These questions will also include screenings for certain conditions. Now, screening is important because finding a problem early helps you to start managing it sooner so you can stay healthier.And sometimes we can completely prevent problems if we see you have a risk. A good example is checking things like blood pressure and cholesterol to help prevent diseases like diabetes and heart disease. Next, we'll work together to come up with a personal prevention plan just for you.
Mrs. Diggs: Oh, I didn't know all that. So preventive care isn't the same for everyone?
Claire: Oh, no, ma'am. Medicare requires that we check for certain things like how physically active you are, whether you use tobacco or alcohol, how much stress you have, and whether you are showing symptoms of having depression or anxiety.And then we can also check to see if you're due for certain things that we can help you schedule, like tests to check your heart or look for certain cancers. And then we use all this information to create your personal prevention plan, which is made up of your specific risks, your overall health, and your preferences.And that's why this visit is so important. It allows us to keep your preventive care plan up to date, making sure you meet your needs for staying healthy.
Mrs. Diggs: That makes sense. And Medicare covers all this?
Claire: It sure does.

Jessica Plitt: Digital accessibility is a team effort. Issues with accessibility can pop up when departments don't communicate and collaborate well. Consider these two examples. David Kutch: First, imagine a student with a disability who is dealing with broken assistive technology in the library, such as screen reader technology or a refreshable braille display that was provided by the institution but no longer works.
Does the student contact the library staff, IT services, or disability services? Would the student be sent back and forth between offices? Jessica Plitt: Or think about the new technology that your school is considering in the procurement process. Has IT reviewed the product to ensure that it includes the accessibility features that your students need?
David Kutch: At the US Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights, we understand the challenges of collaborating among different departments. In fact, in making this series of videos about accessibility, we've coordinated with 25 people on six different teams. We know that teamwork is key to providing accessible services, programs, and activities.
In order to create an organizational culture that embraces accessibility, here's what we recommend. Jessica Plitt: First, learn about your available digital accessibility standards and choose one. The Department of Education does not endorse any particular set of standards, and none is specifically required by the Section 504 or Title II regulations, but many schools use the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines or WCAG.
David Kutch: Next, whatever digital accessibility standard you choose, integrate that standard everywhere, into all your policies, procedures, and practices, and take steps to make sure that key staff throughout the school understand what the standard is and how it works. Jessica Plitt: Third, designate someone to coordinate your school's efforts to comply with digital accessibility and the selected standard.
David Kutch: So what does this organizational culture look like in real life? Perhaps the marketing team is meeting with procurement and IT to confirm that branding colors have sufficient color contrast. Or IT is meeting with disability services before procuring a new learning management system to make sure student and faculty perspectives are considered.
Or teachers, researchers, and other content creators are attending digital accessibility trainings and conferences that help them reach out to and engage with a broader public audience. Jessica Plitt: As you consider how to create an organizational culture that embraces digital accessibility, we also encourage you to reach out to peer institutions.
As described in our other video on vendors and partnerships, you may find peer partnerships to be beneficial as you learn and share resources and knowledge. David Kutch: This video was produced by the US Department of Education Office for Civil Rights.
Jessica Plitt: You can find us at ed.gov/ocr, or email us at ocr@ed.gov.

Chronic care management, CCM, is payable care coordination services. Typically, non-face-to-face interactions, conducted outside regular office visits for Medicare patients with two or more chronic conditions. These are services that routinely require extra time, like coordinating refills with the pharmacy, discussing symptoms with your patient or their family, and checking that function, labs, and other measurable parameters are within defined target ranges.
So what's involved? With CCM, you'll focus on advanced primary care, like providing support with achieving health goals, delivering preventive healthcare, and engaging with the patient and their caregiver. To start, hold an initiating visit. Then work with patients to create a comprehensive care plan and record patient health information using an EHR so the plan is accessible to the care team around the clock.
You'll also manage care transitions and provide other care management services. Thinking about getting started? Here's a few steps to consider. Talk to your eligible patients. Patients with more than two chronic conditions are eligible to participate in CCM and you'll need their verbal consent to get started.
Good candidates are patients who are feeling overwhelmed with managing their health. Don't always recognize symptoms early or need help to stick to their regimen. Create a care plan. Use an extended office visit to collaborate with the patient on a care plan, which combines your assessment, your plan to manage your patient's conditions, and the patient's preferences, priorities, and anticipated preventive healthcare needs, all in one place.
Deliver coordinated care using a team-based approach. Once you create the plan, your clinical staff can carry it out under your supervision. This shared approach may be more cost-effective for your practice. You can bill for clinical staff time when at least 20 minutes a month are spent on these activities.
For more information about CCM components, billing, and patient eligibility, download CMS's CCM booklet.

We work closely with L&D directors, training coordinators, and subject matter experts to develop video content that meets specific learning objectives and LMS requirements. Our team manages every stage of production in-house - from instructional design support and scripting through filming, editing, and accessible final delivery. We are experienced coordinating with federal agency review processes and large organizational approval workflows.
Custom eLearning video production typically ranges from $5,000 to $30,000 per module depending on length, format, and complexity. A single on-camera training module runs $5,000 to $12,000. Animation-heavy or interactive modules with multiple scenarios run higher. Full course series are scoped individually. We are experienced working within federal procurement frameworks and grant-funded project budgets. Contact us for a custom quote based on your learning objectives, timeline, and LMS requirements.
A single eLearning module typically takes 4 to 8 weeks from kickoff to final delivery. That timeline includes instructional design support, scripting, production, editing, and revisions. Projects requiring federal review processes, Section 508 compliance review, or animation typically run longer. We build review time into the production schedule from the start and provide a single point of contact throughout.
We produce eLearning video for federal agencies, healthcare organizations, nonprofits, associations, corporations, and educational institutions. Our eLearning clients include the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Department of Education, Amtrak, JBS International, and the American College of Cardiology. We understand the production standards, LMS requirements, and approval processes of large, complex organizations.
Yes. All eLearning content we produce for federal and state agency clients is delivered in compliance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. This includes closed captioning, audio description where required, and accessible file formats compatible with major assistive technologies and LMS platforms.
We produce on-camera host-driven modules, graphics-driven presentations, animation and motion graphics, subject matter expert interviews, role-playing scenarios, and hybrid formats combining multiple approaches. All formats are available as LMS-ready video files compatible with SCORM, xAPI, and major platforms including Cornerstone, Docebo, and Articulate 360.
We handle the full production process in-house - instructional design support, scripting, pre-production, filming, editing, motion graphics, captioning, and final LMS-compatible delivery. No subcontracting, no hand-offs. One team, one point of contact, from brief to final delivery.

.jpg)